Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZuidervaart, Lambert
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-11T20:39:46Z
dc.date.available2013-11-11T20:39:46Z
dc.date.issued2004-01
dc.identifier.citationZuidervaart, Lambert. "The Great Turning Point: Religion and Rationality in Dooyeweerd's Transcendental Critique." Faith and Philosophy 21 (January 2004): 65-89en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10756/305242
dc.description.abstractHugo Meynell objects to the apparent fideism and anti-foundationalism of Herman Dooyeweerd's philosophy. In response, my essay explicates the historical setting and logical structure to Dooyeweerd's "transcendental critique of theoretical thought." His transcendental critique seeks to uncover the "religious root" of philosophy and of other academic disciplines. Given Dooyeweerd's notion of religion and his account of theoretical thought, I show that Meynell's criticisms are misplaced. Yet they point toward fundamental problems in Dooyeweerd's transcendental critique. Some problems pertain to the logic of Dooyeweerd’s argument, and others to his notion of religion. I explain these problems and indicate how they should be addressed.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSociety of Christian Philosophersen_GB
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subjectDooyeweerd, H. (Herman), 1894-1977en_GB
dc.subjectReformed Philosophyen_GB
dc.subjectPhilosophy and religionen_GB
dc.subjectFaithen_GB
dc.subjectTranscendence (Philosophy)en_GB
dc.subject.lcshDooyeweerd, H. (Herman), 1894-1977. A new critique of theoretical thoughten_GB
dc.subject.lcshDooyeweerd, H. (Herman), 1894-1977--Philosophyen_GB
dc.subject.lcshTranscendence (Philosophy)en_GB
dc.subject.lcshPhilosophy and religionen_GB
dc.subject.lcshFaithen_GB
dc.titleThe Great Turning Point: Religion and Rationality in Dooyeweerd's Transcendental Critiqueen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute for Christian Studiesen_GB
dc.identifier.journalFaith and Philosophyen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2018-03-05T12:30:27Z
html.description.abstractHugo Meynell objects to the apparent fideism and anti-foundationalism of Herman Dooyeweerd's philosophy. In response, my essay explicates the historical setting and logical structure to Dooyeweerd's "transcendental critique of theoretical thought." His transcendental critique seeks to uncover the "religious root" of philosophy and of other academic disciplines. Given Dooyeweerd's notion of religion and his account of theoretical thought, I show that Meynell's criticisms are misplaced. Yet they point toward fundamental problems in Dooyeweerd's transcendental critique. Some problems pertain to the logic of Dooyeweerd’s argument, and others to his notion of religion. I explain these problems and indicate how they should be addressed.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Zuidervaart_20040101a.pdf
Size:
493.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported